Key takeaways
- Market leader with 1B+ sandboxes started and 94% Fortune 100 adoption as of June 2026
- Open-source Firecracker microVMs provide hardware-level isolation for secure code execution
- No longer ephemeral-only — pause/resume persistence preserves filesystem and full memory state, plus snapshots via createSnapshot()
FAQ
What is E2B?
E2B is an open-source cloud platform that provides secure sandboxed environments for AI agents to execute code, used by companies like Perplexity, Hugging Face, and Groq.
How much does E2B cost?
E2B offers a free Hobby tier with $100 initial credits. Pro tier is $150/month plus per-second usage costs (~$0.000028/s for 2 vCPUs).
Who competes with E2B?
Daytona, Modal, Runloop, CodeSandbox SDK, and Fly.io Sprites are direct competitors in the AI sandbox space.
Executive Summary
E2B is the market leader in AI agent sandboxes, providing open-source, secure cloud environments where AI agents can execute code safely. The platform has become the de facto standard for enterprise AI code execution — as of June 2026, E2B claims 94% of Fortune 100 companies use the platform, with 1B+ sandboxes started and 3.5M+ monthly SDK downloads.
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Company | E2B |
| Founded | 2023 |
| Funding | $32M total ($21M Series A, July 2025, led by Insight Partners) |
| Employees | ~25 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA (Czech founders) |
Product Overview
E2B provides cloud-based sandboxed environments specifically designed for AI agents to execute code. The platform uses Firecracker microVMs — the same virtualization technology powering AWS Lambda — to provide hardware-level isolation for running untrusted AI-generated code.
The company was founded by Vasek Mlejnsky (CEO) and Tomas Valenta (CTO), both from the Czech Republic. E2B has quickly become the infrastructure backbone for major AI companies including Perplexity, Hugging Face, Groq, and Manus.
Key Capabilities
| Capability | Description |
|---|---|
| Instant Sandboxes | Spin up isolated environments in ~150ms |
| Code Interpreter | Execute Python, JavaScript, and other languages |
| Custom Templates | Pre-configure environments with dependencies |
| File System Access | Read, write, and manage files within sandboxes |
| Terminal Access | Run shell commands and install packages |
| Network Access | Sandboxes can access the internet for APIs |
| Persistence (Pause/Resume) | Pause a sandbox and resume it later with filesystem and full memory state preserved |
| Snapshots | createSnapshot() briefly pauses execution to capture a persistent snapshot, then returns to running |
Product Surfaces / Editions
| Surface | Description | Availability |
|---|---|---|
| Python SDK | pip install e2b-code-interpreter | GA |
| JavaScript SDK | npm install @e2b/code-interpreter | GA |
| Go SDK | Native Go bindings | GA |
| CLI | Command-line management tools | GA |
| Desktop Sandbox | Virtual desktop for Computer Use | GA |
Technical Architecture
E2B uses Firecracker microVMs, the same technology powering AWS Lambda and Fargate. Each sandbox runs in complete isolation with its own kernel, providing hardware-level security boundaries.
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ E2B Platform │
├─────────────────────────────────┤
│ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ │
│ │ Sandbox │ │ Sandbox │ ... │
│ │ (μVM) │ │ (μVM) │ │
│ └────┬────┘ └────┬────┘ │
│ │ │ │
│ ┌────┴────────────┴────┐ │
│ │ Firecracker Host │ │
│ └──────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────┘
Key Technical Details
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Isolation | Firecracker microVMs (hardware-level) |
| Cold Start | ~150ms in same region |
| Max Duration | 1 hour (Hobby), 24 hours (Pro); timer resets on pause/resume |
| Persistence | Ephemeral by default; pause/resume preserves filesystem + memory (~4s/GiB to pause, ~1s to resume); paused sandboxes kept indefinitely |
| Open Source | Yes (Apache 2.0) |
| Self-Hosting | Available via BYOC deployment |
Strengths
- Market dominance — 94% of Fortune 100, 1B+ sandboxes started, 3.5M+ monthly SDK downloads; proven at scale
- Persistence added — pause/resume preserves filesystem and full memory state (running processes, loaded variables); snapshots create reusable saved states
- Open source — Apache 2.0 license with active GitHub community; no vendor lock-in fear
- Security-first — Firecracker microVMs provide true hardware isolation; enterprise-grade security
- Fast cold starts — ~150ms startup time; competitive with serverless functions
- Model agnostic — Works with OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Llama, or any LLM provider
- Custom templates — Pre-configure environments with dependencies, tools, and files
- Enterprise-ready — SOC2 compliant, BYOC deployment, custom domains
Cautions
- Pause latency scales with RAM — Pausing takes ~4 seconds per GiB of memory; resume is ~1 second
- Pricing complaints — Usage-based costs on top of the $150/mo Pro fee draw consistent developer criticism
- Limited orchestration — Basic sandbox management; no built-in workflow orchestration
- Region constraints — Cold starts increase significantly outside primary regions
- No GPU support — CPU-only; ML workloads requiring GPUs need Modal or alternatives
- 1-hour limit on free tier — Hobby tier limited to 1-hour sessions; Pro needed for longer
What Developers Say
- "We used the E2B sandbox solution, and fortunately it supports volume... This elegantly solves the 'file system' problem." — jdeng, Hacker News, May 2026
- "Daytona and E2B are both great 'sandbox' providers but don't really feel like VMs/you can't run everything you can in an EC2." — benswerd, Hacker News, April 2026
- "E2b is doing great stuff but it is way too expensive and we users do not like that." — fdcaps, Hacker News
Pricing & Licensing
| Tier | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Hobby | Free | $100 one-time credits, 1-hour sessions, 20 concurrent, 10 GiB storage |
| Pro | $150/mo + usage | 24-hour sessions, 100 concurrent (expandable to 1,100), 20 GiB storage |
| Ultimate (Enterprise) | Custom | BYOC, custom limits, dedicated support |
Usage costs (per second):
| Resource | Cost |
|---|---|
| 1 vCPU | $0.000014/s |
| 2 vCPU (default) | $0.000028/s (~$0.10/hour) |
| 4 vCPU | $0.000056/s |
| 8 vCPU | $0.000112/s |
| Memory | $0.0000045/GiB/s (512 MiB–8 GiB) |
| Storage | 10 GiB (Hobby) / 20 GiB (Pro) free |
Licensing model: Open source (Apache 2.0) + usage-based cloud pricing
Hidden costs: Heavy concurrent usage can exceed included credits quickly; long-running sessions add up
Competitive Positioning
Direct Competitors
| Competitor | Differentiation |
|---|---|
| Sprites | Sprites offers always-persistent full VMs; E2B is ephemeral-first but now has pause/resume and snapshots |
| Daytona | Daytona has Computer Use and faster creation (90ms); E2B has stronger isolation (Firecracker vs Docker) |
| Modal | Modal supports GPUs and serverless Python; E2B is sandbox-focused with multi-language support |
| Runloop | Runloop offers disk snapshots and SWE-bench; E2B has larger ecosystem, Fortune 100 adoption, and memory-state snapshots |
When to Choose E2B Over Alternatives
- Choose E2B when: Security is paramount, you need enterprise compliance, or want the largest ecosystem
- Choose Sprites when: You need always-on full VMs rather than pause/resume semantics
- Choose Daytona when: You need Computer Use (desktop automation) or fastest possible creation time
- Choose Modal when: You need GPU access for ML workloads
Ideal Customer Profile
Best fit:
- Enterprise teams needing secure AI code execution at scale
- AI companies building coding agents, data analysts, or research tools
- Organizations requiring SOC2 compliance and enterprise security
- Teams valuing open-source with large community and ecosystem
- High-throughput use cases (evals, benchmarks, parallel processing)
Poor fit:
- ML/AI workloads requiring GPU access
- Teams needing always-on full VMs (docker-in-docker, systemd) rather than sandboxes
- Budget-constrained projects with unpredictable usage
Viability Assessment
| Factor | Assessment |
|---|---|
| Financial Health | Strong — $32M raised, $21M Series A led by Insight Partners (July 2025); no Series B as of June 2026 |
| Market Position | Leader — 94% Fortune 100, largest in category |
| Innovation Pace | Rapid — Persistence (pause/resume), snapshots, Desktop Sandbox, MCP support |
| Community/Ecosystem | Active — 12.5K+ GitHub stars, 3.5M+ monthly downloads |
| Long-term Outlook | Positive — Category leader with enterprise traction |
E2B has established itself as the default choice for AI agent sandboxes. With Insight Partners backing and Fortune 100 adoption, the company has strong runway and market validation. The earlier strategic question — whether ephemeral-first remains optimal as persistent approaches mature — has been answered by E2B shipping pause/resume persistence and snapshots itself.
Bottom Line
E2B is the market leader in AI agent sandboxes, and for good reason. The combination of enterprise-grade security (Firecracker isolation), open-source transparency, and proven scale (1B+ sandboxes started) makes it the safe choice for production deployments.
The old "ephemeral-only" trade-off has largely closed: pause/resume now preserves filesystem and full memory state, and snapshots let you spawn new sandboxes from saved states. Remaining trade-offs are cost (the most consistent developer complaint) and the sandbox model itself — these are not full VMs, so workloads needing systemd or docker-in-docker fit better elsewhere.
Recommended for: Enterprise teams needing secure, scalable AI code execution with proven track record and compliance certifications.
Not recommended for: GPU workloads, always-on full-VM use cases, or budget-constrained projects with unpredictable usage.
Outlook: E2B shipped the persistence and snapshot features predicted in this profile's first edition, while maintaining its security-first positioning. With traction up sharply (94% Fortune 100, 3.5M+ monthly downloads) and no Series B yet as of June 2026, expect a larger raise and deeper enterprise/RL workload expansion next.
Research by Ry Walker Research • methodology
Sources
- [1] E2B Official Website
- [2] E2B Series A Announcement
- [3] E2B Pricing Page
- [4] E2B GitHub Repository
- [5] Better Stack - Best Sandbox Runners 2026
- [6] Northflank AI Sandbox Comparison
- [7] E2B Docs - Sandbox Persistence
- [8] Hacker News comment by jdeng (May 2026)
- [9] Hacker News comment by benswerd (April 2026)
- [10] Hacker News comment by fdcaps