Key takeaways
- E2B dominates the ephemeral sandbox market with 200M+ sandboxes and Fortune 100 adoption
- Sprites challenges the ephemeral model with persistent VMs and instant checkpoint/restore
- Alibaba's OpenSandbox brings a protocol-driven, open-source approach with multi-language SDKs and Docker/Kubernetes runtimes
- Daytona offers the fastest creation (90ms) plus Computer Use support for browser/desktop automation
FAQ
What's the best sandbox for AI agents?
E2B for ephemeral execution, Sprites for persistent state with checkpoints, Daytona for Computer Use, Modal for GPU workloads, OpenSandbox for self-hosted Kubernetes-scale deployments.
Should I use ephemeral or persistent sandboxes?
Ephemeral (E2B) for stateless code execution and security. Persistent (Sprites, Daytona) when agents need to maintain state, installed packages, or context between runs.
Which sandbox supports GPUs?
Modal is the clear leader for GPU workloads. Others focus on CPU-based code execution.
What's the cheapest option?
All have generous free tiers ($30-50). For production, E2B and Sprites offer granular per-second billing. Modal bills per-second with GPU premiums.
Executive Summary
A new infrastructure category has emerged: sandbox platforms for AI agent code execution. These platforms solve the problem of "where should AI-generated code run?" with isolated, secure environments that agents can use to execute arbitrary code.
Market Leaders (13 platforms): AIO Sandbox, E2B, Microsandbox, Sprites, Daytona, Modal, Northflank, OpenSandbox, Quilt, Runloop, CodeSandbox SDK, ComputeSDK, Zeroboot
Key Findings:
- AIO Sandbox (ByteDance-affiliated) takes an all-in-one approach — browser, shell, IDE, Jupyter, and MCP in a single Docker container with shared filesystem
- E2B dominates with 200M+ sandboxes started and Fortune 100 adoption
- Sprites (Fly.io) challenges the ephemeral model with persistent VMs and instant checkpoint/restore
- Daytona offers the fastest creation (90ms) and unique Computer Use support
- Modal leads for GPU workloads with serverless Python infrastructure
- Northflank brings enterprise-grade VPC deployment with GPU support and flexible ephemeral/persistent modes
- OpenSandbox (Alibaba) introduces a protocol-driven open-source approach with multi-language SDKs and Kubernetes-native scaling
- Microsandbox (YC X26) is the only local-first microVM platform — libkrun isolation with network-layer secret injection that prevents credential exfiltration by design
- Zeroboot achieves sub-millisecond spawns (0.79ms) via copy-on-write forking of Firecracker snapshots — 190x faster than E2B
- The market is splitting into ephemeral (security-first) vs persistent (productivity-first) camps, with a new local-first camp emerging
Strategic Planning Assumptions:
- By 2027, checkpoint/restore will become table stakes across all platforms
- By 2028, Computer Use (browser/desktop) will be a standard feature, not a differentiator
Market Definition
AI agent sandboxes are isolated execution environments designed for running AI-generated or arbitrary code safely. They provide:
- Isolation — Code runs in VMs or containers, separated from host systems
- APIs/SDKs — Programmatic creation and management
- Security — Protection against malicious or buggy code
- Scalability — Ability to run thousands of concurrent sandboxes
Key distinction from cloud compute: These are purpose-built for agent use cases, not general application hosting. They optimize for fast creation, easy cleanup, and developer-friendly SDKs.
Comparison Matrix
| Platform | Model | Creation | Persist | Checkpoints | GPU | Isolation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AIO Sandbox | All-in-one | ~seconds | — | — | — | Docker |
| CodeSandbox | Persistent | ~2s | ✅ | ✅ | — | microVMs |
| ComputeSDK | Abstraction | Varies | Varies | Varies | Varies | Varies |
| Daytona | Persistent | 90ms | ✅ | — | — | Docker |
| E2B | Ephemeral | ~150ms | — | — | — | Firecracker |
| Microsandbox | Local-first | ~187ms | ✅ | — | — | libkrun microVMs |
| Modal | Serverless | ~2s | — | — | ✅ | gVisor |
| Northflank | Both | ~1s | ✅ | — | ✅ | microVMs/gVisor |
| OpenSandbox | Ephemeral | ~seconds | — | — | — | Docker/K8s |
| Quilt | Ephemeral | ~200ms | — | — | — | Namespaces |
| Runloop | Persistent | ~2s | ✅ | ✅ | — | Custom |
| Sprites | Persistent | 1-2s | ✅ | ✅ | — | Firecracker |
| Vercel AI Gateway | API Proxy | N/A | N/A | N/A | — | N/A |
| Zeroboot | Ephemeral | 0.79ms | — | — | — | Firecracker CoW |
Daytona also supports Computer Use (Linux/Windows/macOS virtual desktops). Vercel AI Gateway is an API proxy, not an execution sandbox — included for infrastructure completeness.
Product Profiles
AIO Sandbox
All-in-one Docker sandbox combining Browser, Shell, File, VSCode, Jupyter, and MCP in a single container. Built by the Agent Infra team (ByteDance-affiliated), used by UI-TARS-desktop.
- 3.4K+ GitHub stars, active development (150+ releases)
- Unified file system — files shared across browser, shell, IDE, and Jupyter
- Pre-configured MCP servers for browser, file, shell, and document processing
- Python, TypeScript, Go SDKs
- VNC + CDP browser control, VSCode Server, Jupyter Notebook
- ⚠️ Docker-level isolation (weaker than Firecracker/microVM)
- ⚠️ Self-hosted only, no managed cloud offering
Best for: Agent developers wanting a pre-configured all-in-one environment with MCP support. Development and trusted-code scenarios.
Pricing: Free (open source, Apache 2.0, self-hosted).
E2B
The market leader for ephemeral AI sandboxes.[1] Open-source, Firecracker VMs, used by 88% of Fortune 100.
- 200M+ sandboxes started, 1M+ monthly SDK downloads
- Firecracker microVMs (same tech as AWS Lambda)
- Custom templates for pre-configured environments
- Python, JavaScript, Go SDKs
- ⚠️ Ephemeral only — state destroyed after each session
Best for: Stateless code execution, security-sensitive workloads, high-volume eval pipelines.
Pricing: Free tier available. Usage-based billing.
Microsandbox
Local-first microVM sandboxes with network-layer secret injection.[2] The only platform where credentials never leave your machine — not even to the sandbox itself.
- YC X26 batch, founded by Stephen Akinyemi (Zerocore AI)
- libkrun microVMs with hardware isolation (KVM/HVF) — sub-200ms startup
- Secret injection: sandbox sees placeholders; real keys swapped at network layer only for verified TLS to allowed hosts
- Programmable networking: DNS inspection, HTTP interception, domain allowlisting, DLP
- Built-in MCP server for AI agent integration
- Python, JavaScript, Rust SDKs; OCI-compatible images
- Apache 2.0, 5K+ GitHub stars
- ⚠️ Experimental, self-hosted only (cloud "launching soon"), macOS + Linux only
Best for: Developers running AI agents locally who need maximum isolation and cannot tolerate secret exposure to any third-party infrastructure.
Pricing: Free (open source, self-hosted). Cloud offering coming soon.
Sprites
Persistent VMs with instant checkpoint/restore.[3] Fly.io's answer to ephemeral sandbox limitations.
- 100GB persistent ext4 filesystem, backed by object storage
- Checkpoint/restore in ~1 second (like git for the whole system)
- Auto-sleep when idle, wake on demand — no charges when sleeping
- Firecracker VMs with hardware-level isolation
- ⚠️ New product, ecosystem still maturing
Best for: Agents that need state between runs, experimentation with checkpoint/rollback, long-running dev environments.
Pricing: $0.07/CPU-hour, $0.04375/GB-hour memory. ~$0.44 for 4-hour Claude Code session. $30 trial credits.[3]
Daytona
Fastest creation (90ms) with Computer Use support.[4] Open-source, supports Linux/Windows/macOS virtual desktops.
- Sub-90ms sandbox creation
- Computer Use sandboxes — control virtual desktops programmatically
- File, Git, LSP, and Execute APIs
- SSH access, VS Code browser, web terminal for debugging
- Open-source with self-hosting option
- ⚠️ Docker-based isolation (less secure than Firecracker)
Best for: Browser automation agents, Computer Use workloads, teams wanting open-source/self-hosted.
Pricing: Free tier. Usage-based for cloud.
Modal
Serverless Python with elastic GPU scaling.[5] Built for ML/AI workloads, not just code execution.
- Sub-second cold starts, instant autoscaling
- GPU access (NVIDIA A100, H100) without quotas
- Define infrastructure in Python code (no YAML)
- Distributed filesystem for model loading
- ⚠️ Python-centric, less suitable for polyglot agents
Best for: GPU workloads, ML inference, training jobs, Python-native teams.
Pricing: $30/month free credits. Per-second billing for CPU, GPU, memory.
Northflank
Enterprise-grade microVMs with VPC deployment and GPU support.[6] Running millions of sandboxes since 2021.
- Sub-second cold starts with microVM or gVisor isolation
- Deploy in their cloud OR your own VPC (AWS, GCP, Azure, Oracle)
- Ephemeral or persistent — you choose per workload
- GPU support (H100s at $2.74/hour, 62% cheaper than big clouds)
- Persistent volumes up to 64TB, S3-compatible storage
- Built-in CI/CD, autoscaling, and cost controls
- Trusted by Sentry and 50k+ developers
- ⚠️ More full-stack platform than pure sandbox; may be overkill for simple use cases
Best for: Enterprise teams needing VPC deployment, GPU workloads with strong isolation, or hybrid ephemeral/persistent requirements.
Pricing: CPU $0.01667/vCPU-hour, Memory $0.00833/GB-hour. GPUs from $0.80-$3.14/hour. Free sandbox tier available.[7]
OpenSandbox
Open-source sandbox platform from Alibaba with a protocol-driven architecture.[8] Multi-language SDKs and Docker/Kubernetes runtimes for local dev through production scale.
- Defines a "Sandbox Protocol" — standardized lifecycle + execution APIs
- Multi-language SDKs: Python, Java/Kotlin, JS/TS, C#/.NET (Go on roadmap)
- Docker runtime for local dev, high-performance Kubernetes runtime for distributed scheduling
- Built-in Command, Filesystem, and Code Interpreter implementations
- Network policy: unified ingress gateway with multiple routing strategies + per-sandbox egress controls
- Rich examples: Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI, OpenClaw, Playwright, Chrome, VNC desktop, VS Code, RL training
- Apache 2.0 licensed, 2K+ GitHub stars
- ⚠️ Docker-based isolation (weaker than Firecracker); persistent storage still on roadmap
Best for: Teams wanting a self-hosted, protocol-driven sandbox platform with Kubernetes-native scaling and multi-language SDK support.
Pricing: Free (open source, self-hosted only).
Quilt
Open-source container infrastructure with inter-container communication.[9] Self-hostable, built in Rust on Linux namespaces.
- ~200ms container creation
- Inter-container communication (ICC) for networking between containers
- Linux namespaces + cgroups isolation (lighter than Firecracker)
- TypeScript SDK for agent integration
- MIT/Apache-2.0 dual licensing, fully self-hostable
- ⚠️ Weaker isolation than Firecracker; early-stage product
Best for: Multi-container agent architectures, self-hosting, teams needing container networking.
Pricing: Open-source (self-hosted). Cloud offering in development.
Runloop
Devboxes with git-style state management.[10] Snapshot and branch from disk state.
- 2x faster vCPUs on custom bare-metal hypervisor
- 100ms command execution
- Snapshot and branch disk state (like git for sandboxes)
- Built-in SWE-bench integration for agent evaluation
- Repo connections with automatic environment inference
- ⚠️ Focused on agent benchmarking, less general-purpose
Best for: Agent development, SWE-bench evals, teams needing reproducible environments.
Pricing: Contact for pricing. Free trial available.
CodeSandbox SDK
Sandbox API with forking and snapshots.[11] From the popular browser IDE company (now owned by Together AI).
- Programmatic sandbox creation via SDK
- Forking mechanism for A/B testing agents
- Snapshots and hibernation
- Resume development after inactivity
- ⚠️ Acquired by Together AI; product direction may shift
Best for: Teams already using CodeSandbox, web development agents, educational platforms.
Pricing: Free tier. Usage-based for scale.
ComputeSDK
Unified abstraction layer for sandbox providers.[12] Write once, run on E2B, Daytona, Modal, Vercel, or CodeSandbox.
- Hot-swappable providers — change via config, not code rewrites
- Supports E2B, Daytona, Modal, Vercel, CodeSandbox
- Free and open source (TypeScript)
- "Terraform for running other people's code"
- ⚠️ Early stage (94 GitHub stars); abstraction may hide provider-specific features
Best for: Teams wanting multi-provider flexibility or avoiding vendor lock-in.
Pricing: Free (open source). You pay underlying providers directly.
Zeroboot
Sub-millisecond VM sandboxes via copy-on-write forking of Firecracker snapshots. 0.79ms p50 spawn, ~265KB per sandbox.
- Copy-on-write fork of pre-loaded Firecracker memory snapshots
- 0.79ms p50 spawn latency — 190x faster than E2B
- ~265KB memory per sandbox vs ~128MB for E2B (~480x density)
- 1,000 concurrent forks in 815ms on a single machine
- Real KVM hardware-enforced isolation per fork
- Python and TypeScript SDKs, managed API available
- ⚠️ Working prototype, not production-hardened. No networking inside forks. Single vCPU only.
Best for: Batch code execution, agent evaluations at massive scale, high-throughput compute where networking isn't needed.
Pricing: Open source (Apache-2.0, self-hosted). Managed API in early access.
Vercel AI Gateway
Unified API proxy for 100s of AI models with budget controls and fallbacks.
- Single API key accesses OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI, and more
- No markup on tokens — provider list prices
- Automatic retries and fallbacks across providers
- Built-in observability (traces, spend, latency)
- BYOK (Bring Your Own Key) support
- Sub-20ms routing latency
Best for: Teams using Vercel who want unified multi-provider access without managing infrastructure.
Pricing: $5/month free credit. Provider list prices for tokens (no markup).
Note: Vercel AI Gateway is an API proxy, not an execution sandbox. Included here as agent infrastructure.
Architecture Patterns
Isolation Technologies
| Technology | Used By | Security Level | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firecracker | E2B, Sprites | ⭐⭐⭐ Hardware-level | Fast |
| Firecracker CoW | Zeroboot | ⭐⭐⭐ Hardware-level | Fastest |
| libkrun | Microsandbox | ⭐⭐⭐ Hardware-level | Fast |
| gVisor | Modal, Northflank | ⭐⭐ Kernel-level | Very Fast |
| Docker/K8s | AIO Sandbox, Daytona, OpenSandbox | ⭐ Container-level | Fastest |
| Namespaces | Quilt | ⭐ Kernel-level | Very Fast |
| Custom Hypervisor | Runloop | ⭐⭐⭐ Hardware-level | Fast |
| microVMs | CodeSandbox, Northflank | ⭐⭐⭐ Hardware-level | Fast |
Firecracker (used by E2B, Sprites) provides the strongest isolation — the same technology AWS uses for Lambda. Each sandbox is a true microVM with its own kernel.
Ephemeral vs Persistent
The market is splitting into two philosophical camps:[13]
Ephemeral (E2B model):
- Fresh environment every time
- Maximum security (no state leakage)
- Simpler mental model
- Must rebuild environment each session
Persistent (Sprites model):
- State survives between runs
- No rebuilding node_modules/packages
- Checkpoint/restore for experimentation
- Risk of state pollution
Fly.io argues that "ephemeral sandboxes are obsolete" for AI agents — Claude doesn't want a stateless container, it wants a computer.[13] E2B would counter that ephemerality is a feature, not a bug, for security-sensitive enterprise deployments.
Local-first (Microsandbox model):
- Runs on your machine, not in the cloud
- Secrets never leave the host
- No usage-based billing
- Hardware isolation via local hypervisor
- Limited to local compute resources
Microsandbox introduces a third camp: why send your code and credentials to someone else's infrastructure at all?[14] For teams handling sensitive API keys, the local-first model eliminates an entire class of trust concerns.
Enterprise Feature Comparison
| Feature | AIO Sandbox | CodeSandbox | ComputeSDK | Daytona | E2B | Microsandbox | Modal | Northflank | OpenSandbox | Quilt | Runloop | Sprites | Zeroboot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOC2 | — | ✅ | — | ✅ | ✅ | — | ✅ | ✅ | — | — | ❓ | ✅ (Fly.io) | — |
| Self-hosting | ✅ (only) | — | — | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ (only) | — | ✅ (VPC) | ✅ | ✅ | ❓ | — | ✅ |
| Open source | ✅ | — | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | — | — | ✅ | ✅ | — | — | ✅ |
| Custom templates | — | ✅ | — | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ (OCI) | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | — | ✅ | — | ✅ (snapshots) |
| Team features | — | ✅ | — | ✅ | ✅ | — | ✅ | ✅ | — | — | ✅ | — | — |
| GPU | — | — | Varies | — | — | — | ✅ | ✅ | — | — | — | — | — |
| Computer Use | ✅ (VNC+CDP) | — | Varies | ✅ | — | — | — | — | ✅ (VNC) | — | — | — | — |
| Built-in MCP | ✅ | — | — | — | — | ✅ | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Secret protection | — | — | — | — | — | ✅ (network-layer) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Container networking | — | — | — | — | — | ✅ (programmable) | — | ✅ | ✅ (Ingress) | ✅ | — | — | — |
Strategic Recommendations
By Use Case
| Use Case | Recommended | Runner-Up |
|---|---|---|
| High-security enterprise | E2B | Northflank (VPC) |
| Persistent agent state | Sprites | CodeSandbox |
| GPU/ML workloads | Modal | Northflank |
| Browser automation | Daytona | — |
| Agent benchmarking (SWE-bench) | Runloop | E2B |
| Fastest creation time | Zeroboot (0.79ms) | Daytona (90ms) |
| Checkpoint/restore | Sprites | Runloop |
| Local-first / secrets on-host | Microsandbox | — |
| All-in-one dev environment | AIO Sandbox | Daytona |
| Open source preference | E2B | OpenSandbox |
| Cost optimization (idle) | Sprites | Modal |
| Inter-container networking | Quilt | Northflank |
| VPC/BYOC deployment | Northflank | Daytona (self-hosted) |
| Multi-provider flexibility | ComputeSDK | — |
By Team Profile
Security-first enterprise team: → E2B (ephemeral, Firecracker, SOC2) or Northflank (VPC deployment)
AI agent startup iterating fast: → Sprites (persistence saves rebuild time, checkpoints for experimentation)
ML/AI team needing GPUs: → Modal (serverless Python) or Northflank (VPC + full infrastructure)
Building Computer Use agents: → Daytona (only option with desktop automation)
Self-hosted Kubernetes-native team: → OpenSandbox (protocol-driven, multi-language SDKs, K8s scheduling)
Security-paranoid team (secrets must stay on-host): → Microsandbox (local-first microVMs, network-layer secret injection)
Running agent evaluations: → Runloop (built-in SWE-bench) or E2B (scale)
Enterprise needing VPC/BYOC: → Northflank (AWS, GCP, Azure, Oracle support with full platform)
Market Outlook
Near-Term (2026)
- Checkpoint/restore spreading beyond Sprites/Runloop
- E2B maintaining market share lead on ephemeral
- Daytona growing in Computer Use segment
Medium-Term (2027)
- Persistent vs ephemeral distinction blurring (both become options)
- Computer Use becoming standard feature
- GPU support expanding — Northflank already challenging Modal's monopoly
Long-Term (2028+)
- Category may consolidate around 2-3 leaders
- Integration with agent orchestration platforms (Tembo, etc.)
- Specialized sandboxes for specific agent types
Bottom Line
13 platforms serve the AI agent sandbox market with distinct approaches:
| Platform | Best For | Key Differentiator |
|---|---|---|
| AIO Sandbox | All-in-one dev environment | Browser+Shell+IDE+MCP in one container, ByteDance-backed |
| CodeSandbox | Web dev agents | Forking, established ecosystem |
| ComputeSDK | Multi-provider flexibility | Unified API across E2B/Daytona/Modal/etc. |
| Daytona | Computer Use and speed | 90ms creation, Linux/Win/macOS desktops |
| E2B | Ephemeral execution at scale | 200M+ sandboxes, Fortune 100 adoption |
| Microsandbox | Local-first secret protection | libkrun microVMs, network-layer secret injection |
| Modal | GPU workloads | Elastic GPU scaling, Python-native |
| Northflank | Enterprise VPC + GPUs | BYOC deployment, microVM/gVisor isolation |
| OpenSandbox | Self-hosted K8s-scale | Protocol-driven, multi-language SDKs, Alibaba-backed |
| Quilt | Multi-container agents | Open-source, inter-container networking |
| Runloop | Agent development/evals | SWE-bench integration, disk snapshots |
| Sprites | Persistent state with checkpoints | Object-storage durability, instant restore |
| Zeroboot | Ultra-high-throughput batch execution | 0.79ms spawn, ~265KB/sandbox, CoW forking |
The market is early and growing fast. E2B has the adoption lead, but Sprites and Daytona are pushing the boundaries on what sandboxes can do. ByteDance's AIO Sandbox takes a different approach entirely — instead of optimizing one dimension, it bundles everything into a single container with a shared filesystem, betting that integration simplicity matters more than isolation strength for many use cases. Modal leads GPU workloads but Northflank is challenging with cheaper H100s and VPC deployment. Alibaba's OpenSandbox brings a credible open-source, protocol-driven alternative for teams wanting full control at Kubernetes scale. Microsandbox (YC X26) introduces a new axis — local-first microVMs where secrets never leave the host — that may prove compelling as AI agents handle increasingly sensitive credentials. The winners will be determined by which model — ephemeral, persistent, or local-first — proves better for production AI agents, and whether enterprises prefer pure sandboxes or full-stack platforms.
Research by Ry Walker Research
Disclosure: Author is CEO of Tembo, which may integrate with sandbox platforms for agent execution.
Sources
- [1] E2B Website
- [2] Microsandbox GitHub Repository
- [3] Sprites Website
- [4] Daytona Website
- [5] Modal Website
- [6] Northflank Sandboxes
- [7] Northflank Website
- [8] OpenSandbox GitHub
- [9] Quilt Website
- [10] Runloop Website
- [11] CodeSandbox SDK
- [12] ComputeSDK Website
- [13] Code And Let Live
- [14] Microsandbox Website
- [15] ComputeSDK GitHub
- [16] The Design & Implementation of Sprites
- [17] Quilt GitHub
- [18] Zeroboot GitHub
- [19] AIO Sandbox GitHub Repository