Key takeaways
- E2B dominates the ephemeral sandbox market with 200M+ sandboxes and Fortune 100 adoption
- Sprites challenges the ephemeral model with persistent VMs and instant checkpoint/restore
- Daytona offers the fastest creation (90ms) plus Computer Use support for browser/desktop automation
FAQ
What's the best sandbox for AI agents?
E2B for ephemeral execution, Sprites for persistent state with checkpoints, Daytona for Computer Use, Modal for GPU workloads.
Should I use ephemeral or persistent sandboxes?
Ephemeral (E2B) for stateless code execution and security. Persistent (Sprites, Daytona) when agents need to maintain state, installed packages, or context between runs.
Which sandbox supports GPUs?
Modal is the clear leader for GPU workloads. Others focus on CPU-based code execution.
What's the cheapest option?
All have generous free tiers ($30-50). For production, E2B and Sprites offer granular per-second billing. Modal bills per-second with GPU premiums.
Executive Summary
A new infrastructure category has emerged: sandbox platforms for AI agent code execution. These platforms solve the problem of "where should AI-generated code run?" with isolated, secure environments that agents can use to execute arbitrary code.
Market Leaders (7 platforms): E2B, Sprites, Daytona, Modal, Quilt, Runloop, CodeSandbox SDK
Key Findings:
- E2B dominates with 200M+ sandboxes started and Fortune 100 adoption
- Sprites (Fly.io) challenges the ephemeral model with persistent VMs and instant checkpoint/restore
- Daytona offers the fastest creation (90ms) and unique Computer Use support
- Modal leads for GPU workloads with serverless Python infrastructure
- The market is splitting into ephemeral (security-first) vs persistent (productivity-first) camps
Strategic Planning Assumptions:
- By 2027, checkpoint/restore will become table stakes across all platforms
- By 2028, Computer Use (browser/desktop) will be a standard feature, not a differentiator
Market Definition
AI agent sandboxes are isolated execution environments designed for running AI-generated or arbitrary code safely. They provide:
- Isolation — Code runs in VMs or containers, separated from host systems
- APIs/SDKs — Programmatic creation and management
- Security — Protection against malicious or buggy code
- Scalability — Ability to run thousands of concurrent sandboxes
Key distinction from cloud compute: These are purpose-built for agent use cases, not general application hosting. They optimize for fast creation, easy cleanup, and developer-friendly SDKs.
Comparison Matrix
| Platform | Model | Creation | Persist | Checkpoints | GPU | Isolation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CodeSandbox | Persistent | ~2s | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | microVMs |
| Daytona | Persistent | 90ms | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | Docker |
| E2B | Ephemeral | ~150ms | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | Firecracker |
| Modal | Serverless | ~2s | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | gVisor |
| Quilt | Ephemeral | ~200ms | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | Namespaces |
| Runloop | Persistent | ~2s | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | Custom |
| Sprites | Persistent | 1-2s | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | Firecracker |
| Vercel AI Gateway | API Proxy | N/A | N/A | N/A | ❌ | N/A |
Daytona also supports Computer Use (Linux/Windows/macOS virtual desktops). Vercel AI Gateway is an API proxy, not an execution sandbox — included for infrastructure completeness.
Product Profiles
E2B
The market leader for ephemeral AI sandboxes.[1] Open-source, Firecracker VMs, used by 88% of Fortune 100.
- 200M+ sandboxes started, 1M+ monthly SDK downloads
- Firecracker microVMs (same tech as AWS Lambda)
- Custom templates for pre-configured environments
- Python, JavaScript, Go SDKs
- ⚠️ Ephemeral only — state destroyed after each session
Best for: Stateless code execution, security-sensitive workloads, high-volume eval pipelines.
Pricing: Free tier available. Usage-based billing.
Sprites
Persistent VMs with instant checkpoint/restore.[2] Fly.io's answer to ephemeral sandbox limitations.
- 100GB persistent ext4 filesystem, backed by object storage
- Checkpoint/restore in ~1 second (like git for the whole system)
- Auto-sleep when idle, wake on demand — no charges when sleeping
- Firecracker VMs with hardware-level isolation
- ⚠️ New product, ecosystem still maturing
Best for: Agents that need state between runs, experimentation with checkpoint/rollback, long-running dev environments.
Pricing: $0.07/CPU-hour, $0.04375/GB-hour memory. ~$0.44 for 4-hour Claude Code session. $30 trial credits.[2]
Daytona
Fastest creation (90ms) with Computer Use support.[3] Open-source, supports Linux/Windows/macOS virtual desktops.
- Sub-90ms sandbox creation
- Computer Use sandboxes — control virtual desktops programmatically
- File, Git, LSP, and Execute APIs
- SSH access, VS Code browser, web terminal for debugging
- Open-source with self-hosting option
- ⚠️ Docker-based isolation (less secure than Firecracker)
Best for: Browser automation agents, Computer Use workloads, teams wanting open-source/self-hosted.
Pricing: Free tier. Usage-based for cloud.
Modal
Serverless Python with elastic GPU scaling.[4] Built for ML/AI workloads, not just code execution.
- Sub-second cold starts, instant autoscaling
- GPU access (NVIDIA A100, H100) without quotas
- Define infrastructure in Python code (no YAML)
- Distributed filesystem for model loading
- ⚠️ Python-centric, less suitable for polyglot agents
Best for: GPU workloads, ML inference, training jobs, Python-native teams.
Pricing: $30/month free credits. Per-second billing for CPU, GPU, memory.
Quilt
Open-source container infrastructure with inter-container communication.[5] Self-hostable, built in Rust on Linux namespaces.
- ~200ms container creation
- Inter-container communication (ICC) for networking between containers
- Linux namespaces + cgroups isolation (lighter than Firecracker)
- TypeScript SDK for agent integration
- MIT/Apache-2.0 dual licensing, fully self-hostable
- ⚠️ Weaker isolation than Firecracker; early-stage product
Best for: Multi-container agent architectures, self-hosting, teams needing container networking.
Pricing: Open-source (self-hosted). Cloud offering in development.
Runloop
Devboxes with git-style state management.[6] Snapshot and branch from disk state.
- 2x faster vCPUs on custom bare-metal hypervisor
- 100ms command execution
- Snapshot and branch disk state (like git for sandboxes)
- Built-in SWE-bench integration for agent evaluation
- Repo connections with automatic environment inference
- ⚠️ Focused on agent benchmarking, less general-purpose
Best for: Agent development, SWE-bench evals, teams needing reproducible environments.
Pricing: Contact for pricing. Free trial available.
CodeSandbox SDK
Sandbox API with forking and snapshots.[7] From the popular browser IDE company (now owned by Together AI).
- Programmatic sandbox creation via SDK
- Forking mechanism for A/B testing agents
- Snapshots and hibernation
- Resume development after inactivity
- ⚠️ Acquired by Together AI; product direction may shift
Best for: Teams already using CodeSandbox, web development agents, educational platforms.
Pricing: Free tier. Usage-based for scale.
Vercel AI Gateway
Unified API proxy for 100s of AI models with budget controls and fallbacks.
- Single API key accesses OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI, and more
- No markup on tokens — provider list prices
- Automatic retries and fallbacks across providers
- Built-in observability (traces, spend, latency)
- BYOK (Bring Your Own Key) support
- Sub-20ms routing latency
Best for: Teams using Vercel who want unified multi-provider access without managing infrastructure.
Pricing: $5/month free credit. Provider list prices for tokens (no markup).
Note: Vercel AI Gateway is an API proxy, not an execution sandbox. Included here as agent infrastructure.
Architecture Patterns
Isolation Technologies
| Technology | Used By | Security Level | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firecracker | E2B, Sprites | ⭐⭐⭐ Hardware-level | Fast |
| gVisor | Modal | ⭐⭐ Kernel-level | Very Fast |
| Docker | Daytona | ⭐ Container-level | Fastest |
| Namespaces | Quilt | ⭐ Kernel-level | Very Fast |
| Custom Hypervisor | Runloop | ⭐⭐⭐ Hardware-level | Fast |
| microVMs | CodeSandbox | ⭐⭐⭐ Hardware-level | Fast |
Firecracker (used by E2B, Sprites) provides the strongest isolation — the same technology AWS uses for Lambda. Each sandbox is a true microVM with its own kernel.
Ephemeral vs Persistent
The market is splitting into two philosophical camps:[8]
Ephemeral (E2B model):
- Fresh environment every time
- Maximum security (no state leakage)
- Simpler mental model
- Must rebuild environment each session
Persistent (Sprites model):
- State survives between runs
- No rebuilding node_modules/packages
- Checkpoint/restore for experimentation
- Risk of state pollution
Fly.io argues that "ephemeral sandboxes are obsolete" for AI agents — Claude doesn't want a stateless container, it wants a computer.[8] E2B would counter that ephemerality is a feature, not a bug, for security-sensitive enterprise deployments.
Enterprise Feature Comparison
| Feature | CodeSandbox | Daytona | E2B | Modal | Quilt | Runloop | Sprites |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOC2 | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❓ | ✅ (Fly.io) |
| Self-hosting | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❓ | ❌ |
| Open source | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Custom templates | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Team features | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
| GPU | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Computer Use | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Container networking | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
Strategic Recommendations
By Use Case
| Use Case | Recommended | Runner-Up |
|---|---|---|
| High-security enterprise | E2B | Daytona (self-hosted) |
| Persistent agent state | Sprites | CodeSandbox |
| GPU/ML workloads | Modal | — |
| Browser automation | Daytona | — |
| Agent benchmarking (SWE-bench) | Runloop | E2B |
| Fastest creation time | Daytona | E2B |
| Checkpoint/restore | Sprites | Runloop |
| Open source preference | E2B | Quilt |
| Cost optimization (idle) | Sprites | Modal |
| Inter-container networking | Quilt | — |
By Team Profile
Security-first enterprise team: → E2B (ephemeral, Firecracker, SOC2) or Daytona self-hosted
AI agent startup iterating fast: → Sprites (persistence saves rebuild time, checkpoints for experimentation)
ML/AI team needing GPUs: → Modal (only option with elastic GPU access)
Building Computer Use agents: → Daytona (only option with desktop automation)
Running agent evaluations: → Runloop (built-in SWE-bench) or E2B (scale)
Market Outlook
Near-Term (2026)
- Checkpoint/restore spreading beyond Sprites/Runloop
- E2B maintaining market share lead on ephemeral
- Daytona growing in Computer Use segment
Medium-Term (2027)
- Persistent vs ephemeral distinction blurring (both become options)
- Computer Use becoming standard feature
- GPU support expanding beyond Modal
Long-Term (2028+)
- Category may consolidate around 2-3 leaders
- Integration with agent orchestration platforms (Tembo, etc.)
- Specialized sandboxes for specific agent types
Bottom Line
7 platforms serve the AI agent sandbox market with distinct approaches:
| Platform | Best For | Key Differentiator |
|---|---|---|
| CodeSandbox | Web dev agents | Forking, established ecosystem |
| Daytona | Computer Use and speed | 90ms creation, Linux/Win/macOS desktops |
| E2B | Ephemeral execution at scale | 200M+ sandboxes, Fortune 100 adoption |
| Modal | GPU workloads | Elastic GPU scaling, Python-native |
| Quilt | Multi-container agents | Open-source, inter-container networking |
| Runloop | Agent development/evals | SWE-bench integration, disk snapshots |
| Sprites | Persistent state with checkpoints | Object-storage durability, instant restore |
The market is early and growing fast. E2B has the adoption lead, but Sprites and Daytona are pushing the boundaries on what sandboxes can do. Modal owns GPU workloads. The winners will be determined by which model — ephemeral or persistent — proves better for production AI agents.
Research by Ry Walker Research
Disclosure: Author is CEO of Tembo, which may integrate with sandbox platforms for agent execution.