Key takeaways
- OSS adoption and SaaS revenue should reinforce each other.
- Imbalance between flywheels creates drag.
- Measure both and rebalance effort when needed.
FAQ
Why build SaaS around OSS?
It converts distribution into recurring revenue. The SaaS business finances the OSS engine.
How do you keep flywheels aligned?
Track growth signals for each and adjust resourcing. When one lags, invest to rebalance.
Open source your core
This is the foundation. Your open source project is your top-of-funnel, your credibility engine, and your moat against incumbents with bigger marketing budgets. It's how developers discover you, evaluate you, and eventually trust you. Don't hold back the good stuff—the core technology needs to be genuinely useful on its own.
The community-to-commercialization path is a well-documented dynamic for open source businesses, especially in open-core and managed-service models.[1][2]
Build a managed SaaS around it ASAP
Don't wait until you have "enough" open source traction. The SaaS offering validates that real users will pay for convenience, reliability, and support. It also forces you to understand the operational complexity of your own software—which makes the OSS better. Revenue from day one (or close to it) changes how you think about everything.
Keep the OSS and SaaS flywheels spinning at roughly the same speed
This is the hard part. Both flywheels feed each other: OSS adoption drives awareness and trust, which drives SaaS trials; SaaS revenue funds continued OSS development, which drives more adoption.
The balance doesn't have to be perfect, but you need both moving. A thriving OSS project with no commercial traction is a hobby. A SaaS product with a neglected OSS core will eventually lose to someone who cares more about the community.
If one starts spinning faster than the other, redirect effort to compensate
Watch for divergence. If your OSS is blowing up but SaaS conversions are flat, you have a product or positioning problem—fix it before you build a community that never converts.
If your SaaS is growing but OSS engagement is declining, you're extracting value without reinvesting in the ecosystem that created it. Either imbalance becomes harder to correct as you scale. The goal is synchronized momentum, not optimization of one at the expense of the other.
Measuring the flywheels
For OSS, traction metrics include GitHub stars, issues opened, pull requests from external contributors, Hacker News upvotes, Discord/Slack community activity, and conference talk invitations. For SaaS, the best early metric is ADUM (Active Deployments Under Management)—when a human has clicked "Create Deployment" and is getting active value from the service. This matters more than signups because it captures real usage. As you mature, shift focus to traditional SaaS metrics: paying customer count (logos), MRR/ARR, net revenue retention, and churn.
— Ry
Related Essays
OSSRank: How We Think About Open Source Project Quality
A framework for evaluating open source projects beyond star counts — looking at velocity, community health, and commercial viability.
How to Test a Software Startup Idea
A step-by-step framework for testing startup ideas: talk to users, fake the demo, iterate until you know what to build. Don't write code yet.
Professional Services for an Early Stage SaaS Company
Should early-stage SaaS companies do professional services? Advice from Brad Feld, Hiten Shah, and other investors on the product vs. services dilemma.