I represent middle America in this space, and I see a massive opportunity that the coastal narrative keeps missing. Most AI coding tools are built by coastal teams, for coastal teams, sold to coastal teams. That leaves a giant market that is going to be slower to move on cutting-edge tools — and is being meaningfully underserved by Silicon Valley solutions designed for Silicon Valley buyers.
These are real companies with real engineering problems. The private equity-owned manufacturer in Ohio with three tired developers who built a custom ERP fifteen years ago and now need to scale that product to work for four sister companies the PE firm just acquired. Today their options are bad. Hire developers the traditional way and lose the bidding war against FAANG. Outsource and pray. Or freeze the product and accept the ceiling.
I believe there should be a different path, and AI coding is going to create it. Not by replacing the three tired developers, but by giving them the leverage of thirty. The custom ERP gets extended to the sister companies. The tech debt gets tackled in parallel with new feature work. The team that was previously a constraint becomes a force multiplier — because the agent does the warmup work and the human does the judgment.
Tembo is built for that company. Not the coastal startup with twelve Claude Max seats and a culture of fast adoption. The PE-owned legacy operator with a small handful of overworked engineers and a backlog they will never get through with the headcount they have.
I have argued elsewhere that AI coding will democratize software engineering. The coastal version of that thesis is "anyone can ship an app." The middle-American version is "the manufacturer in Ohio finally gets the development capacity it has needed for a decade." Both are true. The second one is a bigger market, and it is barely being served.
— Ry
Sources
Related Essays
Democratizing Software Engineering
AI coding is not about replacing developers. It is about expanding who can request software work in the first place — and 10x-ing total demand.
The Three Tiers of AI Coding Adoption
AI coding adoption is happening in three distinct tiers — assisted, guided, and fully autonomous. Most teams are stuck in tier one and do not realize the gap.
The Road Ahead for AI Coding
We are still early. The trajectory is clear. The companies that build platforms — not just use tools — define the next decade of software development.
Key takeaways
- Most AI coding tools are built by coastal teams for coastal teams. That leaves the rest of the country underserved.
- The PE-owned legacy company with a small handful of tired developers is a real and large market.
- Middle America does not need shinier autocomplete. It needs a different path to scale that does not require hiring 30 engineers.
FAQ
Why is the non-coastal market underserved?
Coastal vendors design for coastal buyers — fast adopters, large eng teams, generous budgets. The mid-market PE-owned company with a small and tired engineering team has different constraints and is not the target customer for the average AI dev tool. The fit is bad and nobody is fixing it.
What does "a different path" mean?
Today the only way to scale software work at a legacy company is to hire more engineers — and good luck competing for talent against FAANG from Akron. AI coding can break that constraint by giving small teams leverage that previously required headcount.