← Back to research
·7 min read·company

ZeptoClaw

ZeptoClaw is a Rust-based personal AI assistant in ~4MB — combining OpenClaw's integrations, NanoClaw's security, and PicoClaw's size discipline without the tradeoffs.

Key takeaways

  • The "notes taker" of the claw ecosystem — studied OpenClaw, NanoClaw, and PicoClaw, then built one binary that avoids each one's tradeoffs
  • ~4MB binary, ~6MB RAM, ~50ms startup — smallest full-featured option with container isolation, 17 tools, and 5 channels
  • Security-by-default: container isolation, prompt injection detection (17 patterns), SSRF prevention, and shell blocklists all enabled out of the box
  • Built-in OpenClaw migration — one command imports config, skills, and provider keys from existing installations

FAQ

What is ZeptoClaw?

ZeptoClaw is a Rust-based personal AI assistant that combines OpenClaw's integrations, NanoClaw's security, and PicoClaw's size in a single ~4MB binary.

How does ZeptoClaw compare to OpenClaw?

ZeptoClaw is 25x smaller (~4MB vs ~100MB), uses 150x less RAM (~6MB vs 1GB+), starts 10x faster, but has fewer channels (5 vs 12) and skills.

Does ZeptoClaw support container isolation?

Yes — Docker and Apple Container isolation are built in. Use --containerized flag for full sandboxing per request.

Can I migrate from OpenClaw to ZeptoClaw?

Yes — run `zeptoclaw migrate` to auto-import config, skills, and provider keys from existing OpenClaw installations.

Executive Summary

ZeptoClaw is a Rust-based personal AI assistant that positions itself as the "one that took notes" — studying OpenClaw's integrations, NanoClaw's security, and PicoClaw's minimalism, then building a single ~4MB binary that avoids each one's tradeoffs. Built by Aisar Labs, it's the newest entrant in the lightweight claw ecosystem.

AttributeValue
CreatorAisar Labs (@qhkm)
LaunchedFebruary 2026
FundingOpen source (unfunded)
GitHub Stars301 ★
LicenseApache 2.0

Product Overview

ZeptoClaw targets users who want OpenClaw's feature set without OpenClaw's resource footprint. The pitch: 17 tools, 5 channels, 8 providers, and container isolation — in a binary smaller than most npm modules.

The project explicitly positions itself against the "tradeoffs" of existing alternatives:

  • OpenClaw: 12 channels, 100+ skills, but 100MB and 400K lines of code
  • NanoClaw: Security-first, but still 50MB of TypeScript
  • PicoClaw: Runs on $10 hardware, but stripped out most features

ZeptoClaw's answer: take notes on what works, ship one binary that includes it all.

Key Capabilities

CapabilityDescription
Multi-Provider LLMClaude + OpenAI with auto-retry, fallback, and cost tracking
17 ToolsShell, filesystem, web, memory, cron, WhatsApp, Google Sheets, plugins
5 ChannelsTelegram, Slack, Discord, Webhook, CLI
Agent SwarmsDelegate to sub-agents with role-specific prompts
Container IsolationDocker or Apple Container per request
OpenClaw MigrationOne-command import of config, skills, and provider keys

Deployment Modes

ModeDescriptionUse Case
CLI AgentInteractive or streaming responsesLocal development
GatewayTelegram/Slack/Discord/Webhook listenerProduction deployment
BatchProcess prompts from text/JSONL filesBulk processing
ContainerizedFull isolation per requestHigh-security environments

Technical Architecture

ZeptoClaw is written in async Rust with Tokio, targeting production multi-tenant deployments where memory efficiency matters.

Architecture

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                 ZeptoClaw Binary                 │
│                    (~4MB)                        │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  ┌─────────────┐  ┌─────────────┐  ┌─────────┐ │
│  │   Channels  │  │   Tools     │  │ Plugins │ │
│  │ TG/Slack/   │  │ 17 built-in │  │  JSON   │ │
│  │ Discord/WH  │  │ + extensible│  │ manifest│ │
│  └─────────────┘  └─────────────┘  └─────────┘ │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  Provider Stack: Claude → OpenAI (fallback)     │
│  Auto-retry (429/5xx) + Token budget tracking   │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
           ↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  Security Layers (all enabled by default)       │
│  Container → Prompt Guard → Secret Scanner →    │
│  Policy Engine → Input Validator → Shell Block  │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Key Technical Details

AspectDetail
LanguageRust (async with Tokio)
Binary Size~4MB
RAM Usage~6MB per instance
Startup Time~50ms
Providers8 (Claude, OpenAI, and 6 others)
Tests1,300+
Open SourceYes (Apache 2.0)

Security Architecture

ZeptoClaw emphasizes security-by-default — all layers run automatically with no config required.

LayerWhat It Does
Container IsolationEvery shell command runs in Docker or Apple Container
Prompt Injection DetectionAho-Corasick multi-pattern matcher (17 patterns) + 4 regex rules
Secret Leak Scanner22 regex patterns catch API keys before they reach the LLM
Policy Engine7 rules blocking system file access, crypto keys, SQL injection
Input Validator100KB limit, null byte detection, repetition analysis
Shell BlocklistRegex patterns blocking reverse shells, rm -rf, privilege escalation
SSRF PreventionDNS pinning, private IP blocking, scheme validation
Tool Approval GateRequire confirmation before dangerous tools

Strengths

  • Balanced feature set — 17 tools, 5 channels, and agent swarms in a 4MB binary; doesn't strip features like PicoClaw
  • Security by default — 7 security layers enabled out of the box; no flags to remember
  • OpenClaw migration pathzeptoclaw migrate imports config, skills, and keys in one command
  • Production-ready multi-tenancy — Isolated workspaces, per-tenant config, Prometheus metrics, ~6MB RAM per tenant
  • Modern Rust codebase — 1,300+ tests, async-first, memory-safe without GC overhead

Cautions

  • Very new — Created February 12, 2026; only 9 days old with 301 stars
  • Fewer channels than OpenClaw — 5 channels vs OpenClaw's 12; no iMessage, IRC, or Matrix
  • Fewer skills — Plugin system available but less mature than OpenClaw's 100+ skills ecosystem
  • Single maintainer risk — Aisar Labs appears to be a solo project; bus factor unknown
  • Limited community validation — Too new for production track record

Pricing & Licensing

TierPriceIncludes
Open SourceFreeFull functionality
API CostsVariableDepends on provider (Claude, OpenAI, etc.)

Licensing: Apache 2.0 — use commercially, modify freely, patent grant included.

Hidden costs: You pay for LLM API calls directly to providers.


Competitive Positioning

vs Other Claw Alternatives

AspectZeptoClawOpenClawNanoClawPicoClawZeroClaw
Binary~4MB~28MB~50MB~8MB3.4MB
RAM~6MB1GB+~200MB<10MB<5MB
Channels512136
Tools17100+LimitedBasic15
ContainerLimitedWASM
MigrationN/A

When to Choose ZeptoClaw

  • Choose ZeptoClaw when: You want OpenClaw features in a smaller package with built-in security
  • Choose OpenClaw when: You need maximum integrations (12 channels) and the largest skill ecosystem
  • Choose ZeroClaw when: Security is paramount and you want WASM sandboxing
  • Choose PicoClaw when: Running on extremely constrained hardware (<10MB RAM)

Ideal Customer Profile

Best fit:

  • Users migrating from OpenClaw who want smaller footprint
  • Multi-tenant operators needing isolated workspaces
  • Security-conscious users wanting defaults, not config
  • Teams who need container isolation per request

Poor fit:

  • Users needing iMessage, IRC, or Matrix channels
  • Those requiring OpenClaw's 100+ skill ecosystem
  • Enterprise teams needing established vendor support
  • Early-stage projects that need battle-tested stability

Viability Assessment

FactorAssessment
Financial HealthN/A (unfunded OSS)
Market PositionNew entrant
Innovation PaceRapid (37+ PRs in 9 days)
CommunityNascent (301 stars)
Long-term OutlookUncertain — too early to assess

ZeptoClaw is too new to assess viability. The technical foundation looks solid (1,300+ tests, clean Rust codebase), but it needs community adoption and time to prove production readiness. Watch for growth trajectory over the next 3-6 months.


Bottom Line

ZeptoClaw is an ambitious attempt to synthesize the best of the claw ecosystem — OpenClaw's features, NanoClaw's security, PicoClaw's efficiency — without each one's tradeoffs. The technical foundation is promising: 4MB binary, 1,300+ tests, 7 security layers enabled by default.

Recommended for: Users who want a smaller OpenClaw with built-in security and are comfortable with a new project.

Not recommended for: Production deployments requiring proven stability, or users needing OpenClaw's full channel/skill ecosystem.

Outlook: Promising but unproven. The OpenClaw migration command is a smart wedge for adoption. Success depends on community growth and whether Aisar Labs can sustain momentum as a solo maintainer.


Research by Ry Walker Research • methodology