Sweep

Executive Summary

Sweep is an AI coding assistant built specifically for JetBrains IDEs, offering an integrated agent, next-edit autocomplete, inline editing, AI commit messages, and AI code review.^[1] With 40K+ installs and 4.9 stars on the JetBrains Marketplace, Sweep has become the leading AI solution for developers who prefer JetBrains tools over VS Code.^[2]

Attribute	Value
Company	Sweep
Platform	JetBrains IDEs (full), VS Code/Zed (autocomplete only)
Installs	40,000+
Rating	4.9 stars
Funding	Not publicly disclosed

---

Product Overview

Sweep fills the "AI gap" in JetBrains IDEs — providing Cursor-like functionality for developers who prefer IntelliJ, PyCharm, GoLand, and other JetBrains tools.^[3]

Core Features

Sweep offers five main capabilities:^[4]

Feature	Description
Agent	Integrated agent that searches codebase, edits code, runs tests, checks linter errors
Next-Edit Autocomplete	Predicts next intent based on recent changes, not just cursor position
Inline Editing	Select code, describe changes, get AI-generated edits
AI Commit Messages	Auto-generates commit messages from staged changes
AI Code Review	Reviews changes for bugs and issues before commit

Supported IDEs

Full feature set (Agent, Inline Editing, Code Review):

• IntelliJ IDEA
• PyCharm
• WebStorm
• GoLand
• PhpStorm
• Rider
• CLion
• RubyMine
• RustRover
• Android Studio
• JetBrains Gateway

Next-Edit Autocomplete only:

• VS Code
• Zed

---

Technical Architecture

Sweep differentiates by leveraging JetBrains' internal static analysis tools — giving its agent access to the same code intelligence that powers JetBrains' refactoring and error detection.^[3]

Key Technical Details

Aspect	Detail
Integration	Native JetBrains plugin (not a standalone app)
Code Analysis	Uses JetBrains internal static analysis
Privacy Mode	Available — code not used for training when enabled
API Model	Credit-based for agent features, unlimited autocomplete on paid plans

---

Strengths

• JetBrains-native — Not a Cursor clone; built specifically for JetBrains with native static analysis integration
• Strong adoption — 40K+ installs, 4.9 stars indicates product-market fit in JetBrains ecosystem
• Intent prediction — Next-Edit Autocomplete predicts based on recent changes, not just context
• Privacy Mode — Code can be excluded from training
• Affordable pricing — $10-60/mo is competitive with Cursor ($20/mo) and GitHub Copilot ($19/mo)
• Multi-IDE support — Works across all JetBrains IDEs with one plugin

---

Cautions

• JetBrains lock-in — Full features only available in JetBrains; VS Code/Zed get limited functionality
• Credit consumption — Agent and advanced features consume API credits that may run out
• No agent orchestration — Single-agent, single-repo focus; no multi-agent or multi-repo capabilities
• Funding opacity — Company funding status not publicly disclosed
• Smaller ecosystem — Less community content compared to Cursor or GitHub Copilot

---

Pricing & Licensing

Tier	Price	Autocomplete	API Credits	Support
Free Trial	$0	1,000	$5 included	Standard
Basic	$10/mo	Unlimited	$10/mo	Standard
Pro	$20/mo	Unlimited	$20/mo	Priority
Ultra	$60/mo	Unlimited	$60/mo	Priority

^[5]

Credit model: API credits consumed by chat, code generation, and advanced completions. Autocomplete is unlimited on paid plans. Auto top-up available.

Discounts: Special pricing for students, educators, and open source maintainers.

---

Competitive Positioning

Direct Competitors

Competitor	Differentiation
JetBrains AI Assistant	Sweep users report it's "a million times better" than JetBrains' native AI
GitHub Copilot	Sweep has deeper JetBrains integration; Copilot works across more editors
Cursor	Cursor is a separate IDE; Sweep works inside your existing JetBrains IDE
Augment Code	Sweep users report switching from Augment to Sweep for better JetBrains experience

When to Choose Sweep Over Alternatives

• Choose Sweep when: You're committed to JetBrains IDEs and want the best AI experience without leaving your editor
• Choose Cursor when: You're willing to switch IDEs for AI-native experience
• Choose GitHub Copilot when: You need broad editor support and don't need advanced agent features
• Choose JetBrains AI when: You want first-party support and are okay with lower quality

---

Ideal Customer Profile

Best fit:

• Professional developers using JetBrains IDEs (IntelliJ, PyCharm, GoLand, etc.)
• Teams standardized on JetBrains who can't switch to Cursor
• Developers frustrated with JetBrains' native AI Assistant
• Users who value staying in their familiar IDE over AI-native experiences

Poor fit:

• VS Code primary users (get autocomplete only)
• Teams needing multi-repo or agent orchestration
• Developers who prefer Cursor's AI-native approach
• Budget-conscious users who can't afford $10-60/mo

---

Viability Assessment

Factor	Assessment
Financial Health	Unknown (funding not disclosed), but strong revenue indicators from 40K+ installs
Market Position	Clear leader in JetBrains AI space; validated by user reviews
Innovation Pace	Active development (early access features for Pro+ tiers)
Community/Ecosystem	Growing; strong testimonials but smaller than Copilot/Cursor communities
Long-term Outlook	Positive as long as JetBrains doesn't significantly improve native AI

Sweep's moat is JetBrains integration depth. The risk is JetBrains improving their native AI Assistant to close the gap.

---

Bottom Line

Sweep is the answer for JetBrains developers who've watched Cursor users get better AI and wondered when their turn would come. It brings Cursor-class AI features to the JetBrains ecosystem without requiring you to switch IDEs.

Recommended for: JetBrains power users who want AI that actually works well in their IDE of choice.

Not recommended for: VS Code users, developers who want agent orchestration, or those who prefer Cursor's AI-native approach.

Outlook: Strong position in a clear niche. JetBrains improving their native AI is the main competitive threat.

---

Research by Ry Walker Research • methodology

Disclosure: Author has no financial relationship with Sweep.