Key takeaways
- Among the cheapest per-token pricing for open-source model inference
- OpenAI-compatible API with 190+ models and minimal setup
- $107M Series B (May 2026) with Nvidia, Samsung Next, and Supermicro participating — no longer the underfunded underdog
- Now offers custom model deployment, dedicated GPU clusters, and SOC 2 / ISO 27001 compliance
- Watch quantization: community reports note FP4 serving where rivals run FP8
FAQ
What is DeepInfra?
A cost-efficient inference platform for running 190+ open-source AI models with simple per-token pricing, operating eight US data centers on its own hardware.
Is DeepInfra OpenAI-compatible?
Yes. Point your existing OpenAI SDK at api.deepinfra.com/v1/openai and your code works without changes.
How does DeepInfra pricing compare?
Generally among the cheapest per-token options for open-source models — e.g., DeepSeek-V4-Flash at $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output as of June 2026.
Is DeepInfra well funded?
Yes. It raised an $18M Series A in April 2025 and a $107M Series B in May 2026 co-led by 500 Global and Georges Harik.
Company Overview
DeepInfra is a cost-efficient inference platform focused on making open-source AI models accessible via simple APIs.[1] The value proposition is straightforward: run popular open-source models at the lowest possible per-token cost with minimal setup.
The "scrappy budget player" framing no longer fits. In May 2026 DeepInfra closed a $107M Series B co-led by 500 Global and Georges Harik, with participation from Nvidia, Samsung Next, Supermicro, A.Capital Ventures, Crescent Cove, Felicis, Peak6, and Upper90.[2] That follows an $18M Series A in April 2025; the company says token volume has grown 25x since then, to nearly five trillion tokens per week.[3] It runs eight US data centers on its own hardware and claims up to 20x inference cost efficiency using Nvidia's Dynamo platform on Blackwell and Vera Rubin GPUs.[4]
What It Does
- Inference APIs — OpenAI-compatible endpoints for LLMs, vision/OCR, embeddings, reranking, image, video, and speech models[5]
- Wide model selection — 190+ open-source models including DeepSeek, Qwen, Llama, Gemma, and Nemotron[4]
- Custom model deployment — Dedicated instances on A100/H100/H200/B200/B300 with autoscaling and private endpoints[5]
- DeepCluster — Dedicated Nvidia B300 GPU clusters at $1.98/GPU-hour, versus roughly $6.50 on public clouds[1]
- Serverless — No infrastructure management, pay only for usage
How It Works
Call OpenAI-compatible API endpoints with your DeepInfra API key — point your existing OpenAI SDK at https://api.deepinfra.com/v1/openai and your code works without changes.[5] Models run on DeepInfra's own GPU fleet in secure US data centers; it handles scaling, optimization, and hardware management.
Pricing
- Per-token pricing — transparent, published rates per model. As of June 2026: DeepSeek-V4-Flash at $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output, Gemma-4-26B at $0.07/$0.34, Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B at $0.50/$2.50[1]
- No minimums or long-term contracts — pay only for what you use
- Self-serve — published rates, no enterprise negotiation required
- Dedicated GPU pricing — $1.98/GPU-hour for B300 clusters via DeepCluster[1]
DeepInfra consistently offers some of the lowest per-token rates in the market for open-source models.
Adoption
As of June 2026, DeepInfra processes nearly five trillion tokens per week — 25x growth since its April 2025 Series A — and reports that over 30% of platform token volume is driven by autonomous agents.[4] CEO Nikola Borisov frames the bet plainly: "Inference is no longer a thin layer – it's the system constraint that will define the majority of workloads."[4]
Strengths
- Cost leader — Among cheapest per-token pricing for open-source models
- Simplicity — Minimal setup, OpenAI-compatible, self-serve
- Owns its stack — Eight US data centers and its own hardware, so per-token price carries no aggregator margin[4]
- Compliance arrived — SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certified, with a zero-data-retention policy[1]
- Well capitalized — $125M raised across Series A and B, with strategic backing from Nvidia, Samsung Next, and Supermicro[2]
- Wide model selection — Quick to add new popular models; 190+ live
Weaknesses / Risks
- No custom silicon — Can't compete with Groq/Cerebras on raw speed
- Quantization opacity — Community observers note DeepInfra serving models at FP4 where other providers run FP8; cheapest tokens may not be equivalent tokens[6]
- Thin moat — Commodity GPU inference remains a race to the bottom, even with owned data centers
- Limited fine-tuning — Still basic compared to Together AI or Fireworks
- Race-to-bottom margins — Competing on price against subsidized Chinese providers pressures unit economics
What Developers Say
Hacker News commenters treat DeepInfra as a pricing reference point for what open-model inference "really" costs. In a June 2026 thread on AI lab margins, wyrdcurt wrote: "even a US provider like DeepInfra can serve DeepSeek 4 Pro at $1.30/M in and $2.60/M out. Unless American labs are doing something wildly inefficient, it feels safe to assume Anthropic has some profit margin on inference at API prices."[7] Another commenter, wongarsu, cited "providers like DeepInfra with no obvious reason to subsidize their API costs" as evidence that published open-model prices reflect true costs.[7]
The critical note concerns quality: in a May 2026 thread, pants2 observed, "Interesting then that OpenRouter tags many providers as FP8 and DeepInfra as FP4," flagging that DeepInfra's price edge may partly come from more aggressive quantization.[6]
Competitive Landscape
vs. Together AI: Together AI offers more features (training, clusters). DeepInfra wins on simplicity and often price, and now matches on dedicated GPU offerings.
vs. Groq: Groq is faster on custom silicon. DeepInfra is cheaper for most models and supports far more model types.
vs. Replicate: Replicate has a community marketplace and image/video focus. DeepInfra is more LLM-focused and often cheaper.
vs. OpenRouter: OpenRouter routes to providers (including DeepInfra); DeepInfra runs its own infrastructure, so there's no aggregator margin.
Ideal User
- Budget-conscious developers running open-source LLMs
- Startups and scaleups that need cheap inference without enterprise overhead
- Teams migrating from OpenAI to open-source models for cost savings
- Agent workloads where token volume, not latency, dominates the bill
Bottom Line
Recommended for: Teams that want the cheapest reliable per-token inference for popular open-source models, agent builders with high-volume background workloads, and anyone migrating off OpenAI with a one-line base-URL swap.
Not recommended for: Latency-critical applications (Groq/Cerebras win on speed), teams needing deep fine-tuning pipelines, or workloads where quantization precision matters and you can't verify what you're getting.
Outlook: The $107M Series B with Nvidia and Samsung Next aboard removes the "underfunded" risk and funds real infrastructure — eight US data centers, Blackwell/Vera Rubin GPUs, SOC 2/ISO 27001.[2] Five trillion tokens a week says the cost-leader strategy is working. The open question is margin durability in a race-to-the-bottom market, and whether FP4 quantization shortcuts erode the trust that cheap tokens depend on.
Sources
- [1] DeepInfra Website
- [2] DeepInfra Raises $107M Series B to Scale Inference Infrastructure
- [3] AI cloud DeepInfra raises $107m in Series B funding round (DCD)
- [4] DeepInfra lands $107M in funding to build out its dedicated inference cloud for open-source models (SiliconANGLE)
- [5] DeepInfra Documentation
- [6] Hacker News comment by pants2 on FP4 quantization (May 2026)
- [7] Hacker News comment by wyrdcurt on inference margins (June 2026)