Key takeaways
- Unified interface for 5+ sandbox providers eliminates vendor lock-in and enables hot-swapping between E2B, Daytona, Modal, Vercel, and CodeSandbox
- Free and open source (TypeScript) — focus on abstraction, not reinventing compute infrastructure
- "Terraform for running other people's code" — simplifies multi-provider orchestration for AI agents
FAQ
What is ComputeSDK?
An open source abstraction layer that provides a unified API for AI agent sandbox providers. Write once, run on E2B, Daytona, Modal, Vercel, or CodeSandbox without code changes.
Is ComputeSDK free?
Yes, ComputeSDK is free and open source. You pay the underlying providers (E2B, Modal, etc.) directly for compute usage.
How does ComputeSDK differ from using providers directly?
ComputeSDK abstracts provider differences behind a unified interface. Switch providers by changing config, not code. Enables multi-provider resilience and avoiding vendor lock-in.
Executive Summary
ComputeSDK provides a unified abstraction layer for AI agent sandbox providers. Instead of learning multiple APIs (E2B, Daytona, Modal, Vercel, CodeSandbox), developers use one consistent interface and hot-swap providers based on requirements. Think "Terraform for running other people's code."
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Company | ComputeSDK |
| Founded | July 2025 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped |
| GitHub Stars | 94 |
| License | Open Source |
Product Overview
Running untrusted or AI-generated code safely is harder than it looks. Teams building AI agents often switch sandbox providers multiple times, each migration requiring significant engineering effort — rewriting integrations, updating authentication, ensuring feature parity.
ComputeSDK solves this by abstracting provider differences behind a unified interface:
import { compute } from 'computesdk';
import { e2b } from '@computesdk/e2b';
// Set default provider
compute.setConfig({
defaultProvider: e2b({ apiKey: process.env.E2B_API_KEY })
});
// Create a sandbox
const sandbox = await compute.sandbox.create();
// Execute code
const result = await sandbox.runCode('print("Hello World!")');
console.log(result.stdout); // "Hello World!"
// Clean up
await sandbox.destroy();
Switching providers is a config change, not a rewrite.
Supported Providers
| Provider | Package | Strengths |
|---|---|---|
| E2B | @computesdk/e2b | Firecracker microVMs, enterprise security |
| Daytona | @computesdk/daytona | Full dev workspaces, Computer Use |
| Modal | @computesdk/modal | GPU support, serverless Python |
| Vercel | @computesdk/vercel | Global serverless, Node.js/Python |
| CodeSandbox | @computesdk/codesandbox | Forking, web dev focus |
Key Capabilities
| Capability | Description |
|---|---|
| Hot-swappable providers | Change providers without code changes |
| Real-time terminal | WebSocket-based interactive sessions |
| File system control | Full CRUD with real-time watching |
| Process management | Start, stop, monitor with port forwarding |
| JWT authentication | Token-based access control |
| TypeScript-native | Full type safety and error handling |
Technical Architecture
ComputeSDK operates as a thin abstraction layer:
Your Agent Code
↓ unified API
ComputeSDK
↓ provider adapter
E2B / Daytona / Modal / Vercel / CodeSandbox
Each provider adapter handles the translation from ComputeSDK's unified interface to provider-specific APIs.
| Aspect | Detail |
|---|---|
| Language | TypeScript (Python SDK in development) |
| Architecture | Adapter pattern per provider |
| Open Source | Yes (GitHub: computesdk/computesdk) |
| Self-hosted | Premium Kubernetes solution planned |
Strengths
- Vendor neutrality — No lock-in; switch providers based on cost, features, or availability
- Operational resilience — Scale across multiple providers during demand spikes
- Development velocity — One API to learn instead of five
- Open source — Inspect, modify, contribute; no hidden costs
- TypeScript-first — Type safety catches errors at compile time
Cautions
- Early stage — 94 GitHub stars; smaller community than established providers
- Abstraction overhead — Some provider-specific features may not be exposed
- Provider costs pass through — ComputeSDK is free but you still pay E2B, Modal, etc.
- Python SDK in development — TypeScript only for now
- No direct execution — Requires underlying provider account
Pricing
ComputeSDK itself: Free and open source.
Provider costs: You pay providers directly at their standard rates:
- E2B: Usage-based (sub-second billing)
- Modal: $30/mo credits, per-second billing
- Daytona: Free tier, usage-based
- Vercel: Serverless pricing
- CodeSandbox: Free tier, usage-based
Use Cases
| Use Case | Why ComputeSDK |
|---|---|
| Multi-provider resilience | Failover between E2B and Daytona during outages |
| Cost optimization | Route to cheapest provider based on workload |
| Avoiding lock-in | Evaluate providers without rewriting code |
| Hybrid requirements | GPU on Modal, CPU on E2B, Computer Use on Daytona |
Competitive Positioning
ComputeSDK doesn't compete with sandbox providers — it abstracts them.
| Approach | Examples | Tradeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Direct provider | E2B, Daytona, Modal | Maximum features, vendor lock-in |
| Abstraction layer | ComputeSDK | Vendor flexibility, some features hidden |
When to Use ComputeSDK
- Use ComputeSDK when: You need multi-provider flexibility or want to avoid lock-in
- Use providers directly when: You need provider-specific features or have standardized on one vendor
Roadmap
Per the announcement blog:
- Premium Kubernetes-based self-hosted environment
- Additional primitives (git, databases, blob storage)
- More provider support (Neon, Supabase, Turso)
- Enhanced monitoring and observability
- Python SDK
Bottom Line
ComputeSDK is the abstraction layer for teams who don't want to bet on a single sandbox provider. It's early (94 stars) but solves a real problem — the pain of rewriting integrations when switching providers.
Recommended for: Teams evaluating multiple sandbox providers, or those wanting operational resilience across providers.
Not recommended for: Teams committed to a single provider who need every provider-specific feature.
Outlook: If the AI agent sandbox market fragments across multiple providers (likely), abstraction layers like ComputeSDK become valuable. Early but well-positioned.
Research by Ry Walker Research • methodology